79 research outputs found

    An Incentive Compatible, Efficient Market for Air Traffic Flow Management

    Full text link
    We present a market-based approach to the Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) problem. The goods in our market are delays and buyers are airline companies; the latter pay money to the FAA to buy away the desired amount of delay on a per flight basis. We give a notion of equilibrium for this market and an LP whose solution gives an equilibrium allocation of flights to landing slots as well as equilibrium prices for the landing slots. Via a reduction to matching, we show that this equilibrium can be computed combinatorially in strongly polynomial time. Moreover, there is a special set of equilibrium prices, which can be computed easily, that is identical to the VCG solution, and therefore the market is incentive compatible in dominant strategy.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1109.521

    Smoothed Efficient Algorithms and Reductions for Network Coordination Games

    Get PDF
    Worst-case hardness results for most equilibrium computation problems have raised the need for beyond-worst-case analysis. To this end, we study the smoothed complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in Network Coordination Games, a PLS-complete problem in the worst case. This is a potential game where the sequential-better-response algorithm is known to converge to a pure NE, albeit in exponential time. First, we prove polynomial (resp. quasi-polynomial) smoothed complexity when the underlying game graph is a complete (resp. arbitrary) graph, and every player has constantly many strategies. We note that the complete graph case is reminiscent of perturbing all parameters, a common assumption in most known smoothed analysis results. Second, we define a notion of smoothness-preserving reduction among search problems, and obtain reductions from 22-strategy network coordination games to local-max-cut, and from kk-strategy games (with arbitrary kk) to local-max-cut up to two flips. The former together with the recent result of [BCC18] gives an alternate O(n8)O(n^8)-time smoothed algorithm for the 22-strategy case. This notion of reduction allows for the extension of smoothed efficient algorithms from one problem to another. For the first set of results, we develop techniques to bound the probability that an (adversarial) better-response sequence makes slow improvements on the potential. Our approach combines and generalizes the local-max-cut approaches of [ER14,ABPW17] to handle the multi-strategy case: it requires a careful definition of the matrix which captures the increase in potential, a tighter union bound on adversarial sequences, and balancing it with good enough rank bounds. We believe that the approach and notions developed herein could be of interest in addressing the smoothed complexity of other potential and/or congestion games

    Nash Social Welfare Approximation for Strategic Agents

    Full text link
    The fair division of resources is an important age-old problem that has led to a rich body of literature. At the center of this literature lies the question of whether there exist fair mechanisms despite strategic behavior of the agents. A fundamental objective function used for measuring fair outcomes is the Nash social welfare, defined as the geometric mean of the agent utilities. This objective function is maximized by widely known solution concepts such as Nash bargaining and the competitive equilibrium with equal incomes. In this work we focus on the question of (approximately) implementing the Nash social welfare. The starting point of our analysis is the Fisher market, a fundamental model of an economy, whose benchmark is precisely the (weighted) Nash social welfare. We begin by studying two extreme classes of valuations functions, namely perfect substitutes and perfect complements, and find that for perfect substitutes, the Fisher market mechanism has a constant approximation: at most 2 and at least e1e. However, for perfect complements, the Fisher market does not work well, its bound degrading linearly with the number of players. Strikingly, the Trading Post mechanism---an indirect market mechanism also known as the Shapley-Shubik game---has significantly better performance than the Fisher market on its own benchmark. Not only does Trading Post achieve an approximation of 2 for perfect substitutes, but this bound holds for all concave utilities and becomes arbitrarily close to optimal for Leontief utilities (perfect complements), where it reaches (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon) for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0. Moreover, all the Nash equilibria of the Trading Post mechanism are pure for all concave utilities and satisfy an important notion of fairness known as proportionality

    Prophet Inequalities for Cost Minimization

    Full text link
    Prophet inequalities for rewards maximization are fundamental to optimal stopping theory with several applications to mechanism design and online optimization. We study the cost minimization counterpart of the classical prophet inequality, where one is facing a sequence of costs X1,X2,,XnX_1, X_2, \dots, X_n in an online manner and must stop at some point and take the last cost seen. Given that the XiX_i's are independent, drawn from known distributions, the goal is to devise a stopping strategy SS that minimizes the expected cost. If the XiX_i's are not identically distributed, then no strategy can achieve a bounded approximation if the arrival order is adversarial or random. This leads us to consider the case where the XiX_i's are I.I.D.. For the I.I.D. case, we give a complete characterization of the optimal stopping strategy, and show that, if our distribution satisfies a mild condition, then the optimal stopping strategy achieves a tight (distribution-dependent) constant-factor approximation. Our techniques provide a novel approach to analyze prophet inequalities, utilizing the hazard rate of the distribution. We also show that when the hazard rate is monotonically increasing (i.e. the distribution is MHR), this constant is at most 22, and this is optimal for MHR distributions. For the classical prophet inequality, single-threshold strategies can achieve the optimal approximation factor. Motivated by this, we analyze single-threshold strategies for the cost prophet inequality problem. We design a threshold that achieves a O(polylogn)\operatorname{O}\left(\operatorname{polylog}{n}\right)-factor approximation, where the exponent in the logarithmic factor is a distribution-dependent constant, and we show a matching lower bound. We note that our results can be used to design approximately optimal posted price-style mechanisms for procurement auctions which may be of independent interest.Comment: 38 page
    corecore